Dr. Michelle A. Amazeen is Director of the Communication Research Center and an associate professor in the Department of Mass Communication, Advertising and Public Relations at Boston University. She earned her Ph.D. in Mass Media and Communication from Temple University in Philadelphia and received a B.S. and M.S. in Advertising from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Amazeen’s research is cross-disciplinary at the intersection of advertising, journalism and political communication. The focus of her research involves mediated persuasion and misinformation, investigating the factors that influence recognition of persuasion and resistance to it. She examines how situational message factors (source, text, visuals, disclosure labels) interact with individual characteristics (demographics, media use motivations, ideology, information literacy) to affect persuasion knowledge, cognitive coping responses, attitudes, and intentions. More broadly, she has examined how media practices (such as political fact-checking and native advertising) facilitate and challenge public perceptions of society. Her work has been previously funded by the American Press Institute and the New America Foundation, has appeared in academic journals such as Digital Journalism, Journal of Political Marketing, Journalism, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly; Media, Culture & Society, and New Media & Society, and has been mentioned by mainstream news outlets such as CNN's GPS, the Daily Beast, and the Street. She has appeared on WHYY's Radio Times and on Boston 25 News.
Her career in the communication industry began by “selling air” and managing the student sales staff at WPGU Radio in Champaign, Illinois. Before returning to academia, she researched the effectiveness of advertising and marketing campaigns for companies including The Signature Group and Millward Brown. A post-midnight encounter with a brand equity perceptual map of toilet bowl cleaners led Dr. Amazeen to reassess her professional aspirations. She now enjoys challenging herself and her students to critically evaluate our media environment.
[SHARE]
Expert DirectLink
-
The metaverse is everything you hate about the internet, strapped to your face
The Grid [February 4, 2022] -
New forms of advertising raise questions about journalism integrity
The Conversation [February 4, 2022] -
Fact Check-How can readers identify science misinformation?
Reuters [February 3, 2022] -
Agenda-Cutting Versus Agenda-Building: Does Sponsored Content Influence Corporate News Coverage in U.S. Media? | Vargo | International Journal of Communication - ijoc.org
UCS Annenberg -
Sharing Native Advertising on Twitter: Content Analyses Examining Disclosure Practices and Their Inoculating Influence
Taylor and Francis online [March 30, 2021] -
-
Dealing with Donald's Lies
WHYY's Radio Times [12/3/15] -
25 Investigates Thousands of Mass IDs Stolen
Boston 25 News [12/12/17] -
Fake news has direct impact on real media, new research finds
Medium [06/15/17] -
The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016
New Media & Society [06/15/17] -
Content Confusion in an Era of Fake News
Truthinadvertising.org [02/07/18] -
The effects of disclosure format on native advertising recognition and audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers
Journalism [02/07/18] -
Saving Media or Trading on Trust? The effects of native advertising on audience perceptions of legacy and online news publishers
Digital Journalism [02/28/17] -
Sometimes political fact-checking works. Sometimes it doesn’t. Here’s what can make the difference.
The Washington Post's Monkey Cage [06/03/15] -
Correcting political and consumer misperceptions: The effectiveness and effects of rating scale versus contextual correction formats.
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly [11/21/2016] -
Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking
Journalism [09/08/17]















